Nursing home characteristics and the development of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour

Citation
Wl. Ooi et al., Nursing home characteristics and the development of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour, AGE AGEING, 28(1), 1999, pp. 45-52
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
AGE AND AGEING
ISSN journal
00020729 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
45 - 52
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-0729(199901)28:1<45:NHCATD>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: to determine how nursing home characteristics affect pressure so res and disruptive behaviour. Method: residents (n = 5518, aged greater than or equal to 60 years) were s elected from 70 nursing homes in the National Health Care chain. Homes were classified as high- or low-risk based on incidence tertiles of pressure so res or disruptive behaviour (1989-90), Point-prevalence and cumulative inci dence of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour were examined along with o ther functional and service variables. Results: the overall incidence of pressure sores was 11.4% and the relative risk was 4.3 times greater in high- than low-risk homes; for disruptive be haviour, the incidence was 27% and the relative risk was 7.1 times greater in the high-risk group. At baseline, fewer subjects in homes with a high ri sk of pressure sores were white or in restraints, but more had received phy sician visits monthly and had had problems with transfers and eating. High- risk homes also had fewer beds and used less non-licensed nursing staff tim e. At follow-up (1987-90), 52% of homes in the low-risk group and 35% of th ose in the high-risk group had maintained their risk status; low-risk homes were more likely to have rehabilitation and maintenance activities. Having multiple clinical risk factors was associated with more pressure sores in high- (but not low-) risk homes, suggesting a care-burden threshold. By log istic regression, the best predictor of pressure sores was a home's prior ( 1987-88) incidence status. Interestingly, 67% of homes with a high risk of pressure sores were also high-risk for disruptive behaviour, while only 27% of homes with a low risk of pressure sores were high-risk for disruptive b ehaviour. A threshold effect was also observed between multiple risk factor s and behaviour. More homes with a high risk of disruptive behaviour (68%) remained at risk over 4 years, and the best predictor of outcome was a home 's previous morbidity level. Conclusion: nursing-home characteristics may have a greater impact than cli nical factors on pressure sores and disruptive behaviour in long-stay, inst itutionalized elders.