Water use and plant response in two rice irrigation methods

Citation
A. Roel et al., Water use and plant response in two rice irrigation methods, AGR WATER M, 39(1), 1999, pp. 35-46
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
03783774 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
35 - 46
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-3774(19990201)39:1<35:WUAPRI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern U S to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. I n PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in compariso n to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is a lso dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, simila r to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent f lood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood peri od, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact wit h the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three p lots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF meth od. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flus hing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was h igher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flo od period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainl y a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to greater evapo ration from the water surface. No differences in ET were found in 1995. Sto matal conductance was lower in FF plots during the non-flood period, indica ting some degree of water stress. Irrigation method did not affect yield, b ut the PP method reduced time to 100% heading by 5 to 7 days. These results suggest that the PP method can be useful not only to suppress red rice, bu t also to save water and produce an earlier maturing crop. Early maturity i s particularly important in areas where ratoon cropping is practiced. (C) 1 999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.