Gj. Locksmith et al., Maternal and neonatal infection rates with three different protocols for prevention of group B streptococcal disease, AM J OBST G, 180(2), 1999, pp. 416-422
OBJECTIVES: We compared maternal and neonatal infection rates under 3 diffe
rent group B streptococcal prevention strategies and also evaluated reasons
for each protocol's failures in preventing neonatal disease.
STUDY DESIGN: Women who were delivered at our center from August 1, 1991, t
hrough April 30, 1998, were managed by 1 of 3 protocols for prevention of e
arly-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection: a selective screening
protocol, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists protocol,
and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended universal s
creening strategy. We compared maternal infection rates and neonatal group
B streptococcal infection rates under each protocol. We also compared reaso
ns for each protocol's failures in preventing neonatal infection.
RESULTS: Clinical chorioamnionitis rates were 7.4% with selective screening
, 7.7% under The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' proto
col, and 5.2% with universal screening (relative risk 0.7, 95% confidence i
nterval 0.6-0.8). Endometritis rates were 4.0% with selective screening, 4.
6% with The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists protocol, a
nd 2.8% with universal screening (relative risk 0.7, 95% confidence interva
l 0.6-0.8). Overall neonatal group B streptococcal infection rates were low
er under the 2 more recent strategies, but not significantly so. Despite th
e ability of universal screening to find more women at risk for group B str
eptococcal transmission, half of the neonatal infections under this protoco
l occurred when the mothers were not considered candidates for prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-endorsed univer
sal screening strategy for group B streptococcal infection prevention was a
ssociated with significantly lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis and e
ndometritis than were the other strategies. We were unable to document stat
istically significant improvement in neonatal outcome under the universal s
creening protocol.