Background: Droperidol even in low doses such as 0,5 mg to 1,25 mg can incr
ease postoperative anxiety and state of tension. The aim of this study was
to determine whether these side effects occur frequently following low-dose
droperidol and to see whether these are dose related.
Methods: 184 female in- and outpatients ASA grade 1 and 2 undergoing gynaec
ological laparoscopy were recruited to this prospective, double-blind study
. General anaesthesia was standardized (induction with thiopentone, fentany
l 2 mu g/kg and vecuronium 0,1 mg/kg,tracheal intubation, maintainance with
enflurane in N2O/O-2). Patients were randomly allocated to receive saline
(n=45), 0,625 mg (n=46), 1,25 mg (n=47) or 2,5 mg (n=46) droperidol i.v. 10
minutes before the end of surgery. 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively,
the patients' anxiety, state of tension and overall mood was evaluated usin
g two psychological questionnaires which had been tested for the perioperat
ive period (Erlanger anxiety and tension-scale/BSKE-EWL-test). Sedation was
evaluated by the staff of the recovery room. In addition, postoperative na
usea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale
and by counting the episodes of retching or vomiting. PONV was then rated o
ver the whole observation period as none, mild, moderate or severe using a
fixed scoring algorithm. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA
and the chi(2)-test.
Results: The patients did not differ with regard to biometric data,duration
of surgery and anaesthesia. The postoperative scores for anxiety, state of
tension and overall mood were not different between the groups at any obse
rvation time (Fig. 1:anxiety and tension: P=0,5687; figure 2: overall mood:
P=0,0647). Quality of sleep in the first night after surgery was the same
in all groups (Table 2 and 3). Sedation was not significantly different (Ta
ble 4; P=0,0704). Furthermore, duration of stay in the recovery room did no
t differ (P=0,4353). On the other hand, three patients from the 2,5 mg drop
eridol group had to stay unexpectedly on the ward overnight, because they h
ad been too much sedated to be discharged at home. This was not the case wi
th any patient from the other groups. Compared to placebo, PONV over the wh
ole 24 h observation period was significantly reduced by droperidol (Fig. 3
; P=0,0338): completely free from PONV: placebo: 41,3%, 0,625 mg droperidol
: 67,4%, 1,25 mg droperidol: 53,2%, 2,5 mg droperidol: 71,7%. Also the seve
rity of PONV was reduced.
Conclusion: In gynaecological laparoscopy under general anaesthesia with tr
acheal intubation,we recommend droperidol 0,625 mg in the prevention of PON
V, as it reduces PONV as well as 2,5 mg with no severe sedation in this dos
age. Psychological side effects did not occur more frequently after droperi
dol compared to placebo in any of the investigated dosages.