Person-fit indices (l(z) and multitest l(zm)) derived from item response th
eory and used to identify misfitting examinees were computed based on respo
nses to cognitive ability and personality tests. l(z) indices from differen
t ability domains within the cognitive tests were uncorrelated with each ot
her; l(z) indices from different tests within the personality domain were m
oderately intercorrelated. Cross-domain correlations were near 0. Test-taki
ng motivation and conscientiousness were correlated moderately with multite
st l(z)m for personality tests and to a lesser extent for cognitive tests.
Test reactions were uncorrelated with any of the l(z) measures. Males had h
igher mean l(z)s than females. This difference could be partly attributed t
o differences in conscientiousness. African-Americans had higher mean l(z)
than Whites. This effect could not be accounted for by test-taking motivati
on or conscientiousness. High values of l(z) affected the criterion-related
validity of the set of cognitive tests such that the validity estimate dec
reased as l(z) increased.