C. Finizia et al., Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of voice and speech quality - A study of patients with laryngeal cancer treated with laryngectomy vs irradiation, ARCH OTOLAR, 125(2), 1999, pp. 157-163
Objective: To compare voice and speech function in patients who underwent l
aryngectomy with that of 2 control groups.
Design: A cross-sectional study comparing acoustic and temporal variables w
ith perceptual evaluations in 3 subject groups.
Setting: University hospital in Goteborg, Sweden.
Subjects: Two groups of patients with laryngeal carcinoma were examined: 12
male patients who had laryngectomy and were using a tracheoesophageal pros
thesis and 12 male patients treated with radical radiotherapy who had a pre
served larynx. The third group consisted of 10 normal controls without lary
ngeal disease.
Main Outcome Measures: Acoustic variables were fundamental frequency, absol
ute fundamental frequency perturbation, speech rate, and maximum phonation
time. Perceptual evaluation included 15 listeners' perceptual evaluation an
d the patients' self-assessment of speech intelligibility, voice quality, a
nd speech acceptability.
Results: No significant acoustic or temporal differences were found between
the laryngectomy and radical radiotherapy groups. There was a significant
difference between the patient groups in perceptual evaluation. Both groups
of patients differed from normal controls in acoustic and temporal measure
s, where the laryngectomy group generally deviated more from the normal con
trols than the patient group treated with radiotherapy. There was a weak, b
ut significant, correlation between absolute fundamental frequency perturba
tion and perceived voice quality.
Conclusions: Perceptual evaluations could indicate significant differences
between the patients who underwent laryngectomy and irradiated patients, wh
ere the acoustic analysis failed to reflect these differences. Both patient
groups could be distinguished according to acoustic and temporal measures
when compared with normal controls. The acoustic analyses were more suffici
ent in voices without severe dysfunction.