Sources of stream sulfate at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Long-term analyses using stable isotopes

Citation
C. Alewell et al., Sources of stream sulfate at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Long-term analyses using stable isotopes, BIOGEOCHEMI, 44(3), 1999, pp. 281-299
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
01682563 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
281 - 299
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-2563(199903)44:3<281:SOSSAT>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Sulfur deposition in the northeastern U.S. has been decreasing since the 19 70s and there has been a concomitant decrease in the SO42- lost from draina ge waters from forest catchments of this region. It has been established pr eviously that the SO42- lost from drainage waters exceeds SO42- inputs in b ulk precipitation, but the cause for this imbalance has not been resolved. The use of stable S isotopes and thr: availability of archived bulk precipi tation and stream water samples at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (H BEF) in New Hampshire provided a unique opportunity to evaluate potential s ources and sinks of S by analyzing the long-term patterns (1966-1994) of th e delta(34)S values of SO42-. In bulk precipitation adjacent to the Ecosyst em Laboratory and near Watershed 6 the delta(34)S values were greater (mean : 4.5 and 4.21, respectively) and showed more variation (variance: 0.49 and 0.30) than stream samples from Watersheds 5 (W5) and 6 (W6) (mean: 3.2 and 3.7; variance: 0.09 and 0.08, respectively). These results are consistent with other studies in forest catchments that have combined results: for mas s balances with stable S isotopes. These results indicate that for those si tes, including the HBEF, where atmospheric inputs are less than or equal to 10 kg S ha(-1) yr(-1), most of the deposited SO42- cycles through the biom ass before it is released to stream water. Results from W5, which had a who le-tree harvest in 1983-1984 showed that adsorption/desorption processes pl ay an important role in regulating net SO42- retention for this watershed-e cosystem. Although the isotopic results suggest the importance of S mineral ization, conclusive evidence that there is net mineralization has not yet b een shown. However, S mass balances and the isotopic result are consistent with the mineralization of organic S being a major contributor to the SO42- in stream waters at the HBEF.