Background False allegations of victimisation although uncommon are importa
nt to recognise. This paper examines those who falsely claim to have been t
he victims of stalking.
Aims To highlight-the phenomenon of false victims of stalking.
Method Twelve individuals who falsely claimed to be victims of stalking wer
e compared with a group of 100 true stalking victims.
Results False stalking victims presented for help earlier than real victims
and were less likely to claim harassment via letters. They reported equiva
lent levels of violence directed at themselves but seldom claimed others we
re attacked. Five types of false claimants were recognisable. False victims
consumed more medical services than genuine stalking victims and they were
more likely to be embroiled in legal action. They reported similar revels
of distress with suicidal ruminations in over 40%.
Conclusions The current interest in stalking is promoting false claims of b
eing stalked. Early identification of these cases and appropriate intervent
ion are essential to both minimising abuses of resources available to true
victims and equally to ensure appropriate care for those who express their
own disordered state in false claims of victimisation.
Declaration of interest None.