Non-invasive assessment of digital vascular reactivity in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis

Citation
Me. Anderson et al., Non-invasive assessment of digital vascular reactivity in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis, CLIN EXP RH, 17(1), 1999, pp. 49-54
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
0392856X → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
49 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0392-856X(199901/02)17:1<49:NAODVR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective To examine digital microvascular responses in patients with primary Raynaud 's phenomenon (PRP) and systemic sclerosis (SSc), and compare these to the responses in healthy control subjects. Methods Digital microvascular responses to repeated episodes of iontophoresis of ac etylcholine chloride (endothelial-dependent), sodium nitroprusside (endothe lial-independant) and adrenaline were measured using dual-channel laser Dop pler in 8 healthy control subjects, 8 patients with PRP and 8 patients with SSc. Results There were no significant differences in responses between groups. For each chemical the greatest response was generally seen in period 7 of the proto col (after the third episode of iontophoresis). For acetylcholine chloride in period 7 the age and baseline adjusted ratio of the maximum response of PRP to control was 0.93, 95% CI (0.26, 3.38) and for SSc to control it was 0.60 95% CI (0.13, 2.81). For sodium nitroprusside in period 7 this age and baseline adjusted ratio of the maximum response of PRP to control was 1.31 , 95% CI (0.74, 2.32) and for SSe to control it was 1.35, 95% CI (0.68, 2.6 7). For adrenaline in period 7, the age and baseline adjusted ratio of PRP to control was 1.51, 95% CI (0.79, 2.89) and for SSe to control it was 2.18 , 95% CI (1.01, 4.69). Conclusion This study demonstrates the usefulness of iontophoresis of vasoactive chemi cals, combined with laser Doppler blood flowmetry, in the non-invasive asse ssment of dermal microvascular responses. One possible explanation for the lack of difference in responses between groups is that vasoactive chemicals other than those discussed are important in the pathophysiology of primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon.