Es. Mendonsa et Bb. Riley, Genetic analysis of tissue interactions required for otic placode induction in the zebrafish, DEVELOP BIO, 206(1), 1999, pp. 100-112
Development of the vertebrate inner ear begins during gastrulation with ind
uction of the otic placode. Several embryonic tissues, including cephalic m
esendoderm, notochord, and hindbrain, have been implicated as potential sou
rces of otic-inducing signals. However, the relative contributions of these
tissues have not been determined, nor have any genes affecting placode ind
uction been identified. To address these issues, we analyzed otic placode i
nduction in zebrafish mutants that are deficient in prospective otic-induci
ng tissues. Otic development was monitored by examining mutant embryos for
morphological changes and, in some cases, by visualizing expression pattern
s of dlx-3 or pax-2.1 in preotic cells several hours before otic placode fo
rmation. In cyclops (cyc(-)) mutants, which develop with a partial deficien
cy of prechordal mesendoderm, otic induction is delayed by up to 1 h. In on
e-eyed pinhead (oep(-)) mutants, which are more completely deficient in pre
chordal mesendoderm, otic induction is delayed by 1.5 h, and morphology of
the otic vesicles is abnormal. Expression of marker genes in other regions
of the neural plate is normal, suggesting that ablation of prechordal mesen
doderm selectively inhibits otic induction. In contrast, the timing and mor
phology of otic development is not affected by mutations in no tail (ntl) o
r floating head (flh), which prevent notochord differentiation. Similarly,
a mutation in valentine (val), which blocks early differentiation of rhombo
meres 5 and 6 in the hindbrain, does not delay otic induction, although sub
sequent patterning of the otic vesicle is impaired. To test whether inducti
ve signals from one tissue can compensate for loss of another, we generated
double or triple mutants with various combinations of the above mutations.
In none of the multiple mutants do the flh or vol mutations exacerbate del
ays in placode induction, although val does contribute additively to defect
s in subsequent patterning of the otic vesicle. In contrast, mutants homozy
gous for both oep and ntl, which interact synergistically to disrupt differ
entiation of cephalic and axial mesendoderm, show a delay in otic developme
nt of about 3 h. These data suggest that cephalic mesendoderm, including pr
echordal mesendoderm and anterior paraxial mesendoderm, provides the first
otic-inducing signals during gastrulation, whereas chordamesoderm plays no
discernible role in this process. Because val(-) mutants are deficient for
only a portion of the hindbrain, we cannot rule out a role for that tissue
in otic placode induction. However, if the hindbrain does provide otic-indu
cing signals, they apparently differ quantitatively or qualitatively from t
he signals required for vesicle patterning, as vol disrupts only the latter
. (C) 1999 Academic Press.