Cg. Willett et al., Prognostic factors in stage T3NO rectal cancer - Do all patients require postoperative pelvic irradiation and chemotherapy?, DIS COL REC, 42(2), 1999, pp. 167-173
PURPOSE: To further define the indications for postoperative pelvic irradia
tion and chemotherapy, an analysis of the influence of extent of tumor inva
sion into perirectal fat, lymphatic or venous vessel invasion, and tumor gr
ade on the clinical course of patients with Stage T3N0 rectal cancer underg
oing surgery was undertaken. METHODS: From 1968 to 1985, 117 patients with
Stage T3N0 rectal cancer underwent resection with curative intent. No patie
nt received neoadjuvant or adjuvant irradiation or chemotherapy. Surgical s
pecimens were assessed for maximum depth of tumor invasion into perirectal
fat, lymphatic or venous involvement, and tumor grade. After surgery the cl
inical course of these patients was assessed for local control, distant met
astases, and survival rate. RESULTS: For 25 patients with tumors exhibiting
favorable histologic features (well-differentiated or moderately well-diff
erentiated carcinomas invading less than 2 mm into perirectal fat, without
lymphatic or venous vessel involvement), the ten-year actuarial rates of lo
cal control and recurrence-free survival were 95 and 87 percent, respective
ly. In contrast, the ten-year actuarial rates of local control and recurren
ce-free survival were inferior (72 and 55 percent, respectively) for 88 pat
ients with tumors exhibiting moderate to deep perirectal fat invasion, vess
el involvement, or poor differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: In the design of futu
re trials of rectal cancer, selection of patients with rectal cancer for po
stoperative adjuvant therapy should be based not only on stage, but also on
depth of invasion into the perirectal fat, vessel involvement, tumor grade
, and integrity of the radial resection margin. For subsets of patients wit
h Stage T3N0 rectal cancer, there may be little benefit to adjuvant therapy
after surgery.