Effect of 3 weeks of detraining on the resting metabolic rate and body composition of trained males

Citation
J. Laforgia et al., Effect of 3 weeks of detraining on the resting metabolic rate and body composition of trained males, EUR J CL N, 53(2), 1999, pp. 126-133
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
ISSN journal
09543007 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
126 - 133
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-3007(199902)53:2<126:EO3WOD>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: To examine the hypothesis that detraining decreases the resting metabolic rate (RMR) of long-term exercisers. Design: Eight pairs of subjects were matched for age, mass and training vol ume. They were then randomly allocated to either a control group (continue normal training) or detraining group (stop normal training but continue act ivities of daily living). Setting: Exercise Physiology Laboratory, The Flinders University of South A ustralia. Subjects: Sixteen male subjects (age 23.1 +/- 4.7 y (s.d.); mass 73.73 +/- 8.9 kg; (V) over dot O-2max 60.2 +/- 6.3 ml. kg(-1) min(-1); height 180.3 /- 5.0 cm; body fat 14.6 +/- 5.4%) were selected from a pool of respondents to our advertisements. Interventions: Each pair of subjects was measured before and after a 3-week experimental period. Results: Two (groups) x 3 (2-, 3- and 4-compartment body composition models ) ANOVAs were conducted on the difference between the pre- and post-treatme nt scores for percentage body fat, fat-free mass (FFM) and relative RMR (kJ .kg FFM-1.h(-1)). No significant between-group differences were identified except for the detraining group's small decrease in FFM (0.7 kg, P = 0.05). The main effects for body composition model were all significant; but the overall differences between the multicompartment models and the 2-compartme nt one were less than their technical errors of measurement. No significant interaction (P = 0.51) resulted from a 2 x 2 ANOVA on the pre- and post-tr eatment absolute RMR data for the control (315.2 and 311.9 kJ/h) and detrai ning groups (325.4 and 325.5 kJ/h). Conclusions: 3-weeks detraining is not associated with a decrease in RMR (k J/h, kJ.kg FFM-1.h(-1)) in trained males; hence, our data do not support a potentiation of the RMR via exercise training. The greater sensitivity of t he multicompartment models to detect changes in body composition was of mar ginal value. Sponsorship: Australian Research Council.