Recent reviews of studies concerning panic attacks in adolescents have
emphasized research limitations, noting problems of validity, reliabi
lity, and lack of normative data. To address some of these limitations
we evaluated two methods of panic ascertainment (questionnaire versus
interview), reliability of interview-determined panic, and clinical c
orrelates of panic symptoms in a large sample (N = 1013) of early adol
escent girls. The 5.4% of the sample who, when interviewed, reported e
ver experiencing a panic attack scored significantly higher on measure
s of depression, anxiety sensitivity, and alcohol use, but were not mo
re avoidant than others. Using the interview as the standard, the ques
tionnaire had a specificity of 81% and a sensitivity of 72%. Adolescen
ts do experience panic attacks-whether identified by questionnaire or
interview-although for many the attacks may not be salient. Longitudin
al studies are required to determine those qualities of nonclinical pa
nic (severity, context, interpretation/attribution), which render some
episodes as clinically meaningful. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.