An Australian-designed bycatch reduction device (BRD), known as the AusTED,
was modified to improve its efficiency and simplify its design. The modifi
ed version (the AusTED II) was tested under a range of conditions typical o
f prawn trawl fisheries of north eastern Australia. Trials occurred during
commercial trawling operations to heighten industry awareness of research i
nto BRDs and improve the credibility of research results to industry. Avera
ge bycatch reduction ranged between 15%? and 49% depending upon fishery con
ditions, and the capture of large animals such as stingrays and sea turtles
was significantly reduced. The AusTED II had a variable effect on prawn ca
tches depending on trawling, conditions, ranging from no significant differ
ence to a 36% loss. The AusTED II offers commercial fishers the benefits of
large animal exclusion plus reduced bycatch. Reductions in bycatch were ex
plained in part by the exclusion of fish species with "fusiform" and "later
ally compressed" body-forms. Unexpectedly, "weak swimming fish" were also e
xcluded consistently by the AusTED II. The trialing of a single BRD across
a range of trawling conditions in north eastern Australia demonstrated the
variability in BRD performance that can be attributed mainly to the quantit
y and composition of bycatch species. It is highly likely that other exclus
ion systems like the AusTED II will not be immediately suitable to all nort
h east Australian trawl fisheries. The acceptance of BRDs by the Australian
trawling industry will depend upon efficient and pragmatic designs coupled
with industry confidence in research results. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.
V. All rights reserved.