This paper presents the results of a study of the dispersion characteristic
s of broadband fundamental-mode surface waves propagating across South Amer
ica and the surrounding oceans. Broad-band waveform data from about 765 eve
nts from 1977 to 1996 recorded at 48 individual stations have produced 7000
Rayleigh-wave and 4800 Love-wave dispersion curves. We present group-veloc
ity maps from 20 to 150 s period for Rayleigh waves and from 20 to 100 s fo
r Love waves. Measurement uncertainties estimated from cluster analyses ave
rage about 0.025-0.030 km s(-1), but are larger for the short-period Love w
aves. We estimate surface resolving kernels and show that the average resol
ution across South America is about 6 degrees-8 degrees for Rayleigh waves
and 7 degrees-10 degrees for Love waves below 100 a period but degrades at
longer periods and near the periphery of the maps. The estimated maps produ
ce a variance reduction relative to the Preliminary Reference Earth Model (
PREM) of more than 90 per cent at short periods, more than 80 per cent for
Rayleigh and Love waves below about 100 s period, but nearer to about 70 pe
r cent at longer periods. Synthetic experiments are presented to estimate t
he bias caused by azimuthal anisotropy using the recent global model of Tra
mpert & Woodhouse (1996). This bias, which is worse for Love than for Rayle
igh waves, may be substantial (up to 5 per cent in some places), but it is
expected to be largely off the continent and is not correlated with the mai
n features of the observed maps. Many known geological and tectonic structu
res are observed in the group-velocity maps. Of particular note are the sig
natures of sedimentary basins (e.g. Maturin-Llanos Basin, Maranon-Ucayali-M
adre de Dies complex, Chaco-Tarija Basin, S. Parana Basin, the basins in th
e W. Caribbean and W. Gulf of Mexico), variations in crustal thickness (e.g
. Andes, Altiplano, Brazilian Highlands), continental roots (e.g. Guyana an
d Guapore shields, Sao Francisco Craton), and the Galapagos thermal anomaly
. Comparison of the estimated group-velocity maps with those predicted by C
RUST5.1/S16B30 is qualitatively good, but there are significant differences
in detail that provide new information that should help to calibrate futur
e crustal and upper-mantle models of South America.