A comparison of two waveform-inversion methods designed to retrieve the mec
hanism of a seismic source and of its time function is presented using vert
ical-component synthetic signals, computed for velocity with a maximum freq
uency of 10 Hz. The geometry of the array of recording stations simulates t
he northeastern Italy Seismometric Network (OGS Trieste), consisting of 16
stations of which 12 are short period, vertical component only, three are s
hort period, three components, and one is broad band. The synthetic seismog
rams are inverted using an inconsistent forward modelling technique; that i
s, by means of Green's functions (GFs) constructed for a structural model d
ifferent from those used to generate the synthetic data. The approach based
on 'overparametrization' of the rupture process, by means of independent m
oment tensor rate functions (MTRFs), and their subsequent reduction to the
source time function (STF) (Method I) is shown to be superior to a traditio
nal approach where the rupture process is constrained a priori (Method II).
With Method I, the effects of inconsistent structural modelling are partia
lly absorbed into the uncorrelated parts of the MTRFs and their reverse sli
ps, which allows us to eliminate them by subsequent retention of the STF as
their positively constrained correlated part. Method I is shown to be able
to yield a reasonable estimate of the STF even in the case when the tradit
ional approach fails completely. Inadequacy of the GF, which may occur due
to mislocation of the hypocentre, is taken into account by comparing the tw
o approaches: the source depth is optimized simultaneously with the determi
nation of the mechanism and the source time function. In addition to its ca
pacity to handle inaccurate structural models, the overparametrization yiel
ding a linear inverse scheme is completely independent from the starting mo
del of the mechanism: Method II, using a gradient scheme, can proceed prope
rly only if the starting source parameters are sufficiently close to the tr
ue ones. The extension of the comparison of the performances between the tw
o methods to an M-d 3.0 earthquake near Friuli, in February 1988, recorded
by seven stations of the OGS Trieste Network gives results in good agreemen
t with the synthetic tests. The orientation of the nodal planes retrieved u
sing Method I is in good agreement with the orientation of the source mecha
nism retrieved from the polarity of first arrivals, while Method II gives c
onsistent results only when starting from the source parameters retrieved u
sing Method I.