Arguments have been made in favour of a constructivist or postpositivist ap
proach to health promotion knowledge development and program evaluation, bu
t little has been articulated about what such an approach would look like.
This article describes a 'story/dialogue method' that was created with and
for practitioners in response to their concerns that much of their practice
did not lend itself to a positivist, or conventional, methodology. Derived
from constructivist, feminist and critical pedagogical theory, and with ro
ots in qualitative methods, the method structures group dialogue around cas
e stories addressing particular generative practice themes. While intended
for practitioner training, organizational development and evaluation, the m
ethod to date has been used primarily for training purposes. This article d
escribes the method, provides an example of its application, and discusses
its strengths, weaknesses and relevance to health promotion.