The United Nations system is complex and its workings often seem muddled to
the outside observer. The UN has struggled with this problem from its ince
ption, sometimes successfully but often not Part of the difficulty lies in
the increasing complexity of the issues being addressed internationally, in
cluding "sustainable development" The expectations raised by such an all-en
compassing term are hardly achievable in immediate terms. This lack of clar
ity in the issues addressed through the UN is also reflected in its institu
tional structures.
The story of Earthwatch is just one example of how the UN has attempted to
bring clarity into its system. In this case, the aim was to bring together
the most up-to-date scientific knowledge and make it policy-relevant on an
ongoing basis. What seemed a relatively straightforward goal has instead be
en fraught with difficulties. In this article, I analyze these difficulties
in terms of the relations between science and policymaking. Three distinct
conceptual approaches have been taken to this relationship: the functional
approach, the feeder-of-information approach, and the assessments-for-poli
cy approach. Each has had a decisive influence on the practices of Earthwat
ch. I conclude that the most recent approach offers the best alternative to
realizing Earthwatch's goal. However, much work remains to be done. To thi
s end I suggest that further research is needed.