Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinomas in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery?
Ch. Lai et al., Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinomas in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery?, INT J GYN C, 9(1), 1999, pp. 28-36
The aim of this study was to define clinicopathologic features and to inves
tigate prognostic factors in early-stage cervical adenocarcinomas and adeno
squamous carcinomas in patients undergoing primary radical surgery. One hun
dred thirty-four patients with stage IB or II cervical adenocarcinoma or ad
enosquamous carcinomas treated at a single institution were reviewed and co
mpared to squamous carcinomas (N = 757) treated in the same period. Among a
deno-adenosquamous carcinomas, stage II disease, parametrial extension, and
deep cervical stromal invasion (>2/3) were associated with increased risk
of pelvic lymph node metastases, while only clinical stage II, DNA index >1
.3 (by flow cytometry), and pelvic node metastases were significantly assoc
iated with decreased survival by multivariate analyses. The five-year recur
rence-free and overall survival rates of patients with adeno-adenosquamous
vs squamous carcinoma were 72.2% vs 81.2% (P = 0.0109), and 74.1% vs 82.8%
(P = 0.0136), respectively by Mantel-Cox test. After controlling confoundin
g factors, histologic type (adeno-adenosquamous vs squamous) was confirmed
as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival [relative
risk (RR): 1.2792; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0628-1.5399, P = 0.0092)
and overall survival (RR: 1.2594, 95% CI: 1.0467-1.5155, P = 0.0146) in th
e whole series (N = 891). Although pattern of relapse by histologic type wa
s not significantly different, patients with recurrent adeno-adenosquamous
carcinoma did significantly worse than those with recurrent squamous carcin
oma. In conclusion, the prognosis of adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma of the c
ervix is slightly worse than squamous tumors. Since salvage of recurrent ad
eno-adenosquamous carcinoma after primary radical surgery is generally inef
fective using conventional treatment, innovative strategies are necessary f
or the high-risk group after primary surgery and all recurrent adeno-adenos
quamous carcinomas regardless of size or site.