Progressive treatment of erectile dysfunction with intracorporeal injections of different combinations of vasoactive agents

Citation
J. Shmueli et al., Progressive treatment of erectile dysfunction with intracorporeal injections of different combinations of vasoactive agents, INT J IMPOT, 11(1), 1999, pp. 15-19
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09559930 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
15 - 19
Database
ISI
SICI code
0955-9930(199902)11:1<15:PTOEDW>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
To account for severity of disease in patients with erectile dysfunction, w e introduced a progressive treatment technique using four protocols of drug injections. The study group consisted of 452 men aged 26-85 y with erectile dysfunction . Protocol I. All patients began with a combination of papaverine and Regit ine in doses adjusted to the estimated severity of dysfunction and to age, up to a maximum dose of 25 mg papaverine and 1.5 mg of Regitine, Protocol I I. Patients who could not achieve sufficient rigidity on protocol I were sw itched to prostin VR, to a maximum of 25 meg. Protocol III. Patients who fa iled protocol II received papaverine, Regitine and prostin VR. Protocol IV. Patients who failed protocol III received atropine sulfate (0.02-0.06 mg) in addition to papaverine, Regitine and prostin. Sufficient rigidity was achieved as follows: Protocol I=305 (67.4%) of the original cohort; Protocol II = 61 of the 147 failures with Protocol I (41.5 %); Protocol III = 55 of the 86 failures with Protocol II (63.9%); Protocol IV = 20 of the remaining 31 patients (64.5%). Overall, sustained rigidity was achieved in 441 of the 452 patients (97.5%). Eleven patients (2.5%) fai led all four protocols and were offered a penile prosthesis. Therefore, using our progressive method, by starting with the most availabl e and inexpensive drugs, patients with erectile dysfunction can be given op timal treatment according to the severity of their disease. The success rat e is high while costs are kept to a minimum.