Disability discrimination in America - HIV/AIDS and other health conditions

Citation
Lo. Gostin et al., Disability discrimination in America - HIV/AIDS and other health conditions, J AM MED A, 281(8), 1999, pp. 745-752
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00987484 → ACNP
Volume
281
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
745 - 752
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(19990224)281:8<745:DDIA-H>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) was widely hailed at the time of its enactment in 1990 as providing broad protection against disability disc rimination, including discrimination against individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), In the years since its enactment, howev er, courts frequently interpreted the ADA as providing far less protection than was initially anticipated. The Supreme Court's first case involving HI V and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Bragdon v Abbott, addressed t his trend by ruling that a woman with asymptomatic HIV infection is protect ed from discrimination in accessing dental services. In doing so, the Court endorsed an interpretation of the ADA that is broadly protective for indiv iduals with disabilities. The Court also ruled that health care professiona ls may legally refuse to treat a patient because of concern that the patien t poses a direct threat to safety only if there is an objective, scientific basis for concluding that the threat to safety is significant. In addition to the ADA, state laws frequently prohibit disability discrimination and a pply to some employers and others not regulated by federal law. A state-by- state survey of those laws demonstrates that, consistent with Bragdon v Abb ott, individuals with asymptomatic HIV have widespread protection on the st ate level.