Counting efficiency of the API Aerosizer

Citation
J. Thornburg et al., Counting efficiency of the API Aerosizer, J AEROS SCI, 30(4), 1999, pp. 479-488
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Chemical Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218502 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
479 - 488
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8502(199904)30:4<479:CEOTAA>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The Aerosizer (Amherst Process Instruments, Inc. Hadley MA) is a time-of-Ri ght instrument frequently used to measure the size distribution of an aeros ol. However, if the Aerosizer's counting efficiency, defined as the number of particles counted divided by the total number entering the instrument, i s not 100% or varies with particle size, the resulting size distribution wi ll be inaccurate. Experiments were conducted to determine the effect of particle diameter, pa rticle concentration, photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltage, and model type on the Aerosizer's counting efficiency. To calculate counting efficiency, the number of particles between 0.3 and 10 mu m recorded by the Aerosizer was divided by the number of particles of the same size collected on each stage of a cascade impactor. Particle diameter, aerosol concentration, Aerosizer model, PMT voltage, and the diameter interaction terms influenced counting efficiency. Counting ef ficiencies were less than 1 % for particles smaller than 0.45 mu m, and mor e than 100% for particles larger than 7 mu m. Increasing the PMT voltage in creased the counting efficiency for the smaller particles, but also created false, larger particles. Counting efficiency decreased as count rate incre ased for count rates greater than 20,000 particles per second. The Aerosize r LD counted particles more efficiently than the Aerosizer Mach 2 because o f improved laser and optics systems. Four regression models that relate cou nting efficiency to the salient operating parameters were developed, one fo r each combination of Aerosizer model and photomultiplier tube voltage stud ied. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.