Functional determinants of the Escherichia coli fis promoter: Roles of -35, -10, and transcription initiation regions in the response to stringent control and growth phase-dependent regulation
Ka. Walker et al., Functional determinants of the Escherichia coli fis promoter: Roles of -35, -10, and transcription initiation regions in the response to stringent control and growth phase-dependent regulation, J BACT, 181(4), 1999, pp. 1269-1280
Escherichia coli Fis is a small DNA binding and bending protein that has be
en implicated in a variety of biological processes. A minimal promoter sequ
ence consisting of 43 bp is sufficient to generate its characteristic growt
h phase-dependent expression pattern and is also subject to negative regula
tion by stringent control. However, information about the precise identific
ation of nucleotides contributing to basal promoter activity and its regula
tion has been scant. In this work, 72 independent mutations were generated
in the fis promoter (fis P) region from -108 to +78 using both random and s
ite-directed PCR mutagenesis. beta-Galactosidase activities from mutant pro
moters fused to the (trp-lac)W200 fusion on a plasmid were used to conclusi
vely identify the sequences TTTCAT and TAATAT as the -35 and -10 regions, r
espectively, which are optimally separated by 17 bp. We found that four con
secutive substitutions within the GC-rich sequence just upstream of +1 and
mutations in the -35 region, but not in the -10 region, significantly reduc
ed the response to stringent control. Analysis of the effects of mutations
on growth phase-dependent regulation showed that replacing the predominant
transcription initiation nucleotide +1C with a preferred nucleotide (A or G
) profoundly altered expression such that high levels of fis P mRNA were de
tected during late logarithmic and early stationary phases. A less dramatic
effect was seen with improvements in the -10 and -35 consensus sequences.
These results suggest that the acute growth phase-dependent regulation patt
ern observed with this promoter requires an inefficient transcription initi
ation process that is achieved with promoter sequences deviating from the -
10 and -35 consensus sequences and, more importantly, a dependence upon the
availability of the least favored transcription initiation nucleotide, CTP
.