Comparison of agar dilution: Disk diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to broth microdilution for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae
Cd. Steward et al., Comparison of agar dilution: Disk diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to broth microdilution for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae, J CLIN MICR, 37(3), 1999, pp. 544-547
Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bact
eria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the acc
uracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods fur detecting fl
uoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, wt compared the accu
racy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away N
eg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of
the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ci
profloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the family
Enterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S, hospitals for a national survei
llance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epid
emiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusi
on and MicroScan), 0.9% (ag-ar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major err
or rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Mino
r error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For o
floxacin, no very major errors were observed. and major errors were noted o
nly with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8
.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek), Minor errors for all methods Here sub
stantially reduced when results with MICs within +/-1 dilution of the broth
microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high
number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.