When Daniel Taradash and flick Moll decided to use the story of a library c
ensorship case in Bartlesville, Oklahoma, described in a September 1950 let
ter to the editor of the Saturday Review as the seed for a script, they con
ceived "to fight McCarthyism through film" and masked their topic and theme
behind "as dull a title as we could think of"-The Library. Despite their e
fforts at subterfuge, the story of a middle-aged librarian who refused to r
emove a book from her library's shelves and suffered the loss of her job an
d her friends as a result became a Storm Center in reality as well as in ti
tle. In so doing, it mirrored both the conditions that inspired it and the
case on which it was based. This study employs a number of primary sources,
including the papers of writer-director Daniel Taradash, the records of th
e American Library Association, and the papers of Ruth W. Brown, the librar
ian an whose case the film was loosely based, to examine the controversies
that swirled around Storm Center from its inception during the investigatio
ns into Communist influence in Hollywood to its reception more than five ye
ars later at the American Library Association's summer conference and subse
quent release. Through its highly fictionalized version of the BartlesviIle
Library censorship case, Storm Center directly challenged McCarthyism.