A comparison of pectoral and abdominal transvenous defibrillator implantation: Analysis of costs and outcomes

Traditionally cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was performed by surg eons under general anesthesia. However, with advances in lead and pulse gen erator technology, the surgical implantation technique has been simplified and routine pectoral pulse generator placement without general anesthesia i s now possible. To assess the economic benefit of pectoral implantation, we analyzed 43 consecutive initial transvenous defibrillator implantations. T he patients were grouped according to whether the implant was abdominal by a surgeon in the operating room (n = 23) or pectoral by an electrophysiolog ist in a laboratory (n = 20), The duration of hospitalization was significa ntly longer in the operating room than in the laboratory group (8.1 +/- 3.4 vs 5.8 +/- 2.4 days, p = 0.01), which was due primarily to the postoperati ve stay which averaged 1.9 days longer, Total costs were $40,274 +/- 6,861 for the operating room cohort and $32,546 +/- 3,634 for the lab group (p < 0.001), This reduction was due to a 32% lowering of professional costs and an 18% lowering of facility costs. We conclude that pectoral defibrillator implantation is cost effective and results in significant reductions of hos pital stay.