In response to the paper by Keown am Fochemsen in which the latest empirica
l data concerning euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherl
ands is discussed, this paper discusses three points.
The use of euthanasia in cases in which palliative care was a viable altern
ative may be taken as proof of a slippery slope. However, it could also be
interpreted as an indication of a shift towards more autonomy-based end-of-
life decisions.
The cases of non-voluntary euthanasia are a serious problem in the Netherla
nds and they are only rarely justifiable. However,they do not prove the exi
stence of a slippery slope.
Persuading the physician to bring euthanasia cases to the knowledge of the
authorities is a problem of arty euthanasia policy. The Dutch notification
procedure has recently been changed to reduce the underreporting of cases.
However, many questions remain.