M. Paulino et al., Remote identification of impact forces on loosely supported tubes: Analysis of multi-supported systems, J PRES VESS, 121(1), 1999, pp. 61-70
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Mechanical Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME
Impact forces are useful information in field monitoring of many industrial
components, such as heat exchangers, condensers, etc. In two previous pape
rs we presented techniques-based on vibratory measurements remote fr om the
actual impact locations-for the experimental identification of isolated im
pacts (Araujo et al., 1996) and complex rattling forces (Antunes et at, 199
7). In both papers a single gap support was assumed. Those results concern
systems which are simpler than the actual multi-supported tube bundles foun
d in heat exchangers. Impact force identification is a difficult problem fo
r such systems, because 1) when sensed by the remote motion transducers, th
e traveling waves generated at several impact supports are mixed, and there
is no obvious way to isolate the contribution of each support; 2) multisup
ported tubes may be quite long, with significant dissipative effects (by in
teracting flows or by frictional phenomena at the clearance supports), lead
ing to some loss of the information carried by the traveling waves; 3) in m
ulti-supported systems, some of the supports are often in permanent contact
, leading to nonimpulsive forces which are difficult to identify. In this p
aper we move closer towards force identification under realistic conditions
. Only the first problem of wave isolation is addressed, assuming that damp
ing effects are small and also that all clearance supports are impacting. A
n iterative multiple-identification method is introduced, which operates in
an alternate fashion between the time and frequency domains. This techniqu
e proved to be effective in isolating the impact forces generated at each g
ap support. Experiments were performed on a long beam with three clearance
supports, excited by random forces. Beam motions were planar, with complex
rattling at the supports. Experimental results are quite satisfactory as th
e identified impact forces compare favorably,vith the direct measurements.