Hp. Lefebvre et al., Effects of renal impairment on the disposition of orally administered enalapril, benazepril, and their active metabolites, J VET INT M, 13(1), 1999, pp. 21-27
The pharmacokinetics of benazepril, enalapril, and their active metabolites
(benazeprilat and enalaprilat) were compared after a single administration
of each product by the oral route at the recommended dosage (0.5 mg/kg for
both drugs) in the dog before and after moderate experimental renal impair
ment. Ten dogs were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 5 animals in a 2-perio
d crossover design for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor administrati
on. Renal failure was surgically induced by right nephrectomy and electroco
agulation of the remaining kidney. Renal mass reduction induced a significa
nt decrease (P < .001) in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (1.7 +/- 0.3 ver
sus 3.3 +/- 0.7 mL/kg/minute). No significant differences before and after
surgery were observed for enalapril and benazepril kinetics. The area under
the curve (AUC) for enalaprilat increased after surgery from 23.6 +/- 14.7
to 42.4 +/- 20.9 mu g minute/mL (P < .01). Mean peak plasma concentration
(C-max) was increased in the impaired dogs (59.1 +/- 23.3 versus 43.9 +/- 3
2.9 ng/mL), but this variation was not significant (P >. 05). Renal failure
had no significant effect on AUC for benazeprilat (13.8 +/- 9.8 versus 14.
9 +/- 5.0 mu g.minute/ml) (P > .05), but C-max decreased significantly (fro
m 55.0 +/- 26.4 to 31.9 +/- 17.7 ng/mL) (P < .05). Multiple regression anal
ysis showed that both GFR and AUC for enalapril were highly significant var
iables that explained the variation in AUC for enalaprilat (R-2 = .86, P <
.001) but not for benazeprilat (R-2 = .12, P > .05). The results of this st
udy indicate that exposure to enalaprilat, but not to benazeprilat, is incr
eased in dogs with subclinical renal impairment.