A. Hyland et al., EFFECT OF PROXY-REPORTED SMOKING STATUS ON POPULATION ESTIMATES OF SMOKING PREVALENCE, American journal of epidemiology, 145(8), 1997, pp. 746-751
The use of proxy respondents in surveys designed to provide population
estimates of smoking prevalence offers an inexpensive way to obtain t
hese data. The accuracy of this information is examined in analyzing d
ata from tobacco use surveys of adults conducted in 22 North American
communities as part of the National Cancer Institute's Community inter
vention Trial for Smoking Cessation. Proxy-reported smoking status was
obtained in a cross-sectional telephone survey conducted from August
1993 to January 1994 (n = 99,682). Self-reported smoking status was ob
tained from an in-depth interview of a sample of the respondents aged
25-64 years enumerated from the telephone survey (n = 31,417). Discrep
ancy rates were calculated by comparing the proxy-reported and self-re
ported smoking statuses of a given individual (n = 10,226), in both su
rveys, respondents were categorized as current smokers (those who curr
ently smoke and have smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime)
, recent quitters (less than or equal to 8 years since cessation), lon
g-term quitters (>8 years since cessation), and never smokers. The ove
rall discrepancy rate between the self-report and the proxy report was
5.4%. Self-respondents who were black, Hispanic, Asian, recent quitte
rs, or aged 25-34 years were more likely to have inconsistent proxy re
ports, The authors estimate that the screener interview underestimated
the true smoking prevalence by 0.1% when they corrected for smoking s
tatus discrepancies. These results confirm that proxy-reported smoking
status is an accurate and effective means to monitor populationwide s
moking prevalence of adults.