A number of well known diagnostic equations for the determination of the he
ight, h, of the nocturnal boundary layer, with minimum data requirements of
at most surface wind speed, air temperature and total cloud cover, have be
en tested as to their effectiveness. The computed values have been compared
with direct estimation of h, from temperature or wind profiles of rawinson
de ascents available at 00Z (02h LST). The comparison between computed and
observed values shows that best agreement is found when the nocturnal bound
ary layer height is determined through wind profiles. The ratio of the comp
uted to the observed values reveals a strong dependence on stability, resul
ting in overestimation by the models for very low stability and underestima
tion for strong stability. The simple expressions involving the wind speed
rather than other stability parameters resulted in a better overall fit to
the observed values. A simple prognostic model is shown to provide the best
estimates of the NBL height compared to both wind and temperature profile
definition.