Ch. Kang et Db. Lancaster, Actinide-only burnup credit for pressurized water reactor spent nuclear fuel - III: Bounding treatment of spatial burnup distributions, NUCL TECH, 125(3), 1999, pp. 292-304
A flat, uniform axial burnup assumption, preferred for its computational si
mplicity does not always conservatively, estimate the pressurized water rea
ctor spent-fuel-cask multiplication factors, Rather, the reactivity effect
of the significantly underburned fuel ends, usually referred to as the "end
effect," can be properly treated bi explicit modeling of the axial burnup
distribution based on limiting axial burnup profiles. An alternative approa
ch to this laborious explicit modeling is to augment the multiplication fac
tor determined from an axially uniform calculation by an appropriate k(eff)
bias. Based on the observation that the end effect increases with a decrea
se in the cask size, conservative k(eff) bias curves are determined by appl
ying the limiting axial burnup profiles and assuming a single-assembly cask
configuration. However, because of their conservative nature, the k(eff) b
ias curves are not recommended unless there is a large reactivity margin in
the particular cask of interest,
The horizontal burnup distribution poses less reactivity concern simply bec
ause the limiting arrangement in a cask is an unlikely event. The possibili
ty of two or more assemblies with low burnup zones placed inward and next t
o each other is small, while the underburned fuel ends will surely be nest
to each other. Regardless, the reactivity effect of the horizontal burnup d
istribution is bounded by assuming a conservative horizontal burnup, gradie
nt within individual assemblies and the most reactive arrangement of multip
le assemblies in spent nuclear fuel casks. This approach can have a signifi
cant effect on small cask designs where the orientation of fuel assemblies
has a substantial influence on the calculated multiplication factor because
of the large radial neutron leakage.