Schedule-dependent synergism and antagonism between paclitaxel and methotrexate in human carcinoma cell lines

Citation
Y. Kano et al., Schedule-dependent synergism and antagonism between paclitaxel and methotrexate in human carcinoma cell lines, ONCOL RES, 10(7), 1998, pp. 347-354
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09650407 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
7
Year of publication
1998
Pages
347 - 354
Database
ISI
SICI code
0965-0407(1998)10:7<347:SSAABP>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Paclitaxel and methotrexate are active against a variety of solid tumors. B ecause of differences in their mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, the combination of these two agents has clinical potential. Clinical studie s of this combination are in progress. We studied the optimal schedule of p aclitaxel and methotrexate in combination at various schedules in vitro usi ng human lung cancer A549, breast cancer MCF7, ovarian cancer PA1, and colo n cancer WiDr cells. Cells were simultaneously exposed to paclitaxel and me thotrexate for 24 h and sequentially exposed to paclitaxel for 24 h followe d by methotrexate for 24 h or vice versa. Cell growth inhibition after 5 da ys was determined by a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The effects of drug combinations at the concentration of drug that produced 80% cell growth inhibition (the IC80 level) were ana lyzed by the isobologram method. The simultaneous exposure to paclitaxel an d methotrexate produced additive to antagonistic effects in the A549 and PA 1 cells, and antagonistic effects in the MCF7 and WiDr cells. The sequentia l exposure to paclitaxel followed by methotrexate produced additive effects in all four cell lines. The reverse sequence produced synergistic effects in the A549, MCF7, and WiDr cells, and additive effects in the PA1 cells. T hese findings suggest that a sequential administration of methotrexate foll owed by paclitaxel may be the appropriate schedule for this combination. On the basis of the observed in vitro synergism, further in vivo and clinical studies are necessary to clarify the toxicity and proposed antitumor effec ts of this schedule.