People's subjective probability judgments of external events are often suba
dditive (Le., the probability estimates of component parts of a single even
t sum to greater than one)-a clear violation of the extensional nature of p
robability theory. We show that people's frequency judgments of personal ev
ents can also be subadditive. We found subadditivity evert when component e
vents made up a proper subset of a wider composite event. Our findings impl
y that the somewhat arbitrary choice of the specificity with which question
s are asked can produce widely different reports for the same composite eve
nts.