S. Baqer et Bj. Mitchell, Regional variation of Lg coda Q in the continental United States and its relation to crustal structure and evolution, PUR A GEOPH, 153(2-4), 1998, pp. 613-638
Records from broadband digital stations have allowed us to map regional var
iations of Lg coda Q across almost the entire United States. Using a stacke
d ratio method we obtained estimates of Q(0) (Lg coda Q at 1 Hz) and its fr
equency dependence, eta, for 218 event-station pairs. Those sets of estimat
es were inverted using a back-projection method to obtain tomographic image
s showing regional variations of Q(0) and eta. Q(0) is lowest (250-300) in
the California coastal regions and the western part of the Basin and Range
province, and highest (650-750) in the northern Appalachians and a portion
of the Central Lowlands. Intermediate values occur in the Colorado Plateau
(300-500), the Columbia Plateau (300-400), the Rocky Mountains (450-550), t
he Great Plains (500-650), the Gulf Coastal Plain and the southern portion
of Atlantic Coastal Plain (400-500), and the portions of the Central Lowlan
ds surrounding the high-e region (500-550). The pattern of Q(0) variations
suggests that the United States can be divided into two large Q provinces.
One province spans the area from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic coast,
is tectonically stable, and exhibits relatively high Q(0). The other exten
ds westward from the approximate western margin of the Rocky Mountains to t
he Pacific coast, is tectonically active, and exhibits low Q(0). The transi
tion from high to low Lg coda Q in the western United States lies further t
o the west than does an upper mantle transition for Q and electrical resist
ivity found in earlier studies. The difference in Q(0) between the western
and eastern United States can be attributed to a greater amount of intersti
tial crustal fluids in the west. Regions of moderately reduced Q within the
stable platform often occur where there are accumulations of Mesozoic and
younger sediments. Reduced Q(0) in the southeastern United States may not b
e due to anelasticity but may rather be explained by a gradational velocity
increase at the crust-mantle boundary that causes shear energy to leak int
o the mantle.