We present a model to address in a unified manner four ways in which a mono
polist can interfere with secondary markets. In the model, consumers have h
eterogeneous valuations for quality so that used-good markets play art allo
cative role. Our results are the following: (1) In contrast to Swan's famou
s independence result a monopolist does not provide socially optimal durabi
lity. (2) Allowing the monopolist to rent does not restore socially optimal
durability and increases the monopolist's market power in the used market.
However, forcing the monopolist to sell the goods may be a bad policy beca
use it would lend to either lower output or lower durability. (3) The manuf
acturer benefits from a well functioning used-good market despite the fact
that used goods provide competition for new goods. (4) The monopolist prefe
rs to restrict consumers' abilities to maintain the good.