Delayed diaphragm recovery in 12 patients after high cervical spinal cord injury. A retrospective review of the diaphragm status of 107 patients ventilated after acute spinal cord injury

Citation
T. Oo et al., Delayed diaphragm recovery in 12 patients after high cervical spinal cord injury. A retrospective review of the diaphragm status of 107 patients ventilated after acute spinal cord injury, SPINAL CORD, 37(2), 1999, pp. 117-122
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINAL CORD
ISSN journal
13624393 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
117 - 122
Database
ISI
SICI code
1362-4393(199902)37:2<117:DDRI1P>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Study Design: The functional outcome of the diaphragm after acute spinal co rd injury was reviewed over a 16 year period for 107 patients who had requi red assisted ventilation in the acute phase. Objectives: To quantify the incidence of recovery of diaphragm function whi ch occurred beyond the period of acute oedema; to produce a time-related pr ofile of this as a guide to clinicians considering phrenic nerve pacing; an d to assess the value of phrenic nerve testing in predicting recovery. Setting: The Southport Regional Spinal Injuries Centre. Southport, England. Methods: Bilateral phrenic nerve and diaphragm integrity was assessed clini cally, by spirometry, and by fluoroscopy without and with phrenic nerve sti mulation. Results: Thirty-one per cent of all the ventilated patients (33 cases), wit h a level of injury between C1 and C4 (Scale A in ASIA Impairment Scale), h ad diaphragmatic paralysis at the time of respiratory failure, The subseque nt diaphragm recovery which appeared in seven of these patients, between 40 and 393 days (mean 143), permitted weaning from ventilatory support at 93 to 430 days (mean 246) after the acute injury, with a vital capacity of ove r 15 ml kg(-1) at that stage. The diaphragm recovery in a further five pati ents, whose vital capacity remained below 10 ml kg(-1) and who could not be fully weaned, occurred significantly later, between 84 and 569 days (mean 290), P = 0.053. Negative phrenic nerve tests were followed by weaning at a later interval in several cases. By contrast, one patient with an early po sitive phrenic stimulation test and subsequent diaphragm activity could not be weaned from the ventilator. Conclusion: Twenty-one per cent of the patients with initial diaphragm para lysis were ultimately able to breathe independently after 4 and 14 months, whilst a further 15% had some diaphragm recovery. Phrenic nerve testing sho uld be repeated at 3 monthly intervals for the first year after high tetrap legia.