Indirect ELISAs based on recombinant and affinity-purified glycoprotein E of Aujeszky's disease virus to differentiate between vaccinated and infected animals
Os. Morenkov et al., Indirect ELISAs based on recombinant and affinity-purified glycoprotein E of Aujeszky's disease virus to differentiate between vaccinated and infected animals, ACT VET HU, 47(1), 1999, pp. 137-150
Two indirect ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against glycoprotein E
(gE) of Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV) in sera have been developed. The rec
-gE-ELISA is based on the E. coli-expressed recombinant protein containing
the N-terminal sequences of gE (aa 1-125) fused with the glutathione S-tran
sferase from Schistosoma japonicum. The affi-gE-ELISA is based on native gE
, which was purified from virions by affinity chromatography. The tests wer
e optimised and compared with each other, as well as with the recently deve
loped blocking gE-ELISA (Morenkov et al., 1997b), with respect to specifici
ty and sensitivity. The rec-gE-ELISA was less sensitive in detecting ADV-in
fected animals than the affi-gE-ELISA (sensitivity 80% and 97%, respectivel
y), which is probably due to the lack of conformation-dependent immunodomin
ant epitopes on the recombinant protein expressed in E. coli. The specifici
ty of the rec-gE-ELISA and affi-gE-ELISA was rather moderate (90% and 94%,
respectively) because it was necessary to set such cut-off values in the te
sts that provided a maximum level of sensitivity, which obviously increased
the incidence of false positive reactions. Though the indirect ELISAs dete
ct antibodies against many epitopes of gE, the blocking gE-ELISA, which det
ects antibodies against only one immunodominant epitope of gE, showed a bet
ter test performance (specificity 99% and sensitivity 98%). This is most pr
obably due to rather high dilutions of the sera used in the indirect gE-ELI
SAs (1:30) as compared to the serum dilution in the blocking gE-ELISA (1:2)
. We conclude that the indirect gE-ELISAs are sufficiently specific and sen
sitive to distinguish ADV-infected swine from those vaccinated with gE-nega
tive vaccine and can be useful, in particularly affi-gE-ELISA, as additiona
l tests for the detection of antibodies to gE.