The cognitive science of reading is broader from my perspective than f
rom Lorch and van den Broek's (1997) viewpoint. In particular, verbal
protocol analyses have resulted in substantial new insights about impo
rtant control processes in reading. Much has also been learned with co
gnitive science methods about the letter- and word-level processes inv
olved in reading and learning to read. When the entire cognitive scien
ce of reading literature is considered, two conclusions emerge: There
has been enormous progress in the past 20 years in understanding readi
ng, and cognitive science offers a theory and methodologies that will
permit great additional progress in the years and decades ahead. (C) 1
997 Academic Press.