Due to heightened public health interest, a growing number of consumer heal
th behaviour studies are focusing on the effect of health information on th
e demand for health inputs and outcomes. Many of these studies, however, ha
ve overlooked the potential endogeneity of information variables stemming f
rom unobserved individual heterogeneity. Due to simultaneity bias, ignoring
endogeneity may lead to inaccurate estimates of informational effects on h
ealth behaviour. Using dietary intake data for fat, saturated fat, choleste
rol, and fibre, this paper illustrates the pitfalls of treating health info
rmation related to these nutrients as exogenous variables in their demand e
quations. In most of the estimated models, the exogeneity of information is
statistically rejected. When the information variables are treated as exog
enous variables, their effects on dietary intakes are underestimated. The e
stimated effects of key intake determinants such as income, education, ethn
icity, and race are also different in such a specification compared to a sp
ecification which treats information variables as endogenous. Implications
for nutrition education policies are discussed.