Losses of nitrogen from an effluent-irrigated plantation

Citation
Cj. Smith et Wj. Bond, Losses of nitrogen from an effluent-irrigated plantation, AUST J SOIL, 37(2), 1999, pp. 371-389
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00049573 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
371 - 389
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-9573(1999)37:2<371:LONFAE>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Effluent-irrigated tree plantations are becoming a popular alternative to t he direct discharge of sewerage effluent into inland rivers. However, when irrigated at the water-use rate of the plantation, nitrogen (N) applied in the effluent often exceeds the demand of the trees both in the early stages of growth and after canopy closure when much of the N is supplied from the decomposition of litter. With the ample supply of water and large loadings of N, conditions are conducive to significant N losses. The principal pote ntial N loss mechanisms are leaching of nitrate-N to groundwater and biolog ical denitrification. In 4 separate experiments between winter 1992 and sum mer 1994, N-15-labelled N (total application of 2 g N/m(2); 30 atom%) was a pplied to 1-m(2) subplots or small plastic (PVC) cylinders. In the first 2 experiments, using 1-m(2) subplots, the conservative tracer Br was applied as KBr with the N-15 at a total application of 12.8 g Br-/m(2). In Expt 1, the high recovery of the N-15-labelled N, and the comparable distribution o f N-15 and Br- in the soil profile, implied that there was little loss of N by denitrification, even though the soil was sufficiently wet for leaching of both tracers. Although less conclusive, the other experiments also show ed a high potential for leaching and minimal loss of applied N-15-labelled N by denitrification. The small contribution to N loss of denitrification, despite conditions being otherwise suitable for it, is attributed to the fr ee-draining nature of the soil, which meant that aeration was rarely suffic iently limited to encourage denitrification. Similar results are expected a t other effluent irrigation sites on freely draining soils.