An essential feature of political representation is that a mediating assemb
ly is set between the citizenry and political decision making. Representati
on involves indirect decision making or agency. Rational actor political th
eory often assumes representation in order to focus on problems of a princi
pal-agent kind, but offers only relatively weak arguments for representatio
n. We offer an alternative argument for representation that builds on our b
roader interpretation of rational actor political theory - an interpretatio
n that emphasizes expressive considerations relative to instrumental consid
erations, and operates in a richer motivational setting. As well as providi
ng an account of representation, we believe that our approach is capable of
re-connecting rational actor political theory to many of the concerns of m
ore traditional political theory.