Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma
H. Schenker et al., Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma, CLIN THER, 21(1), 1999, pp. 138-147
This study was designed to compare timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming s
olution 0.5% (timolol gel) once daily with timolol maleate ophthalmic solut
ion 0.5% (timolol solution) twice daily with respect to patient preference,
intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect, and tolerability. A total of 2
02 patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma and an IOP grea
ter than or equal to 22 mm Hg were enrolled in this 12-week, randomized, ob
server-masked, two-period crossover study. Significantly more patients pref
erred timolol gel to timolol solution (P < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of pa
tients preferring timolol gel strongly agreed or agreed that once-daily dos
ing was a reason for their preference. Those who preferred timolol solution
did so because of fewer side effects. The mean IOP-lowering effects of the
2 treatments were similar at both morning trough and peak time points. The
incidence of drug-related adverse experiences was similar (timolol gel 11.
4% vs timolol solution 10.9%). Because both treatments were well tolerated
and effective in lowering IOP, timolol gel, with its once-daily dosing regi
men, should be considered in patients who are candidates for therapy with a
n ophthalmic beta-blocking agent.