Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma

Citation
H. Schenker et al., Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma, CLIN THER, 21(1), 1999, pp. 138-147
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
138 - 147
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(199901)21:1<138:PPEACW>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
This study was designed to compare timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming s olution 0.5% (timolol gel) once daily with timolol maleate ophthalmic solut ion 0.5% (timolol solution) twice daily with respect to patient preference, intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect, and tolerability. A total of 2 02 patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma and an IOP grea ter than or equal to 22 mm Hg were enrolled in this 12-week, randomized, ob server-masked, two-period crossover study. Significantly more patients pref erred timolol gel to timolol solution (P < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of pa tients preferring timolol gel strongly agreed or agreed that once-daily dos ing was a reason for their preference. Those who preferred timolol solution did so because of fewer side effects. The mean IOP-lowering effects of the 2 treatments were similar at both morning trough and peak time points. The incidence of drug-related adverse experiences was similar (timolol gel 11. 4% vs timolol solution 10.9%). Because both treatments were well tolerated and effective in lowering IOP, timolol gel, with its once-daily dosing regi men, should be considered in patients who are candidates for therapy with a n ophthalmic beta-blocking agent.