Since the distinction was first drawn between content and relational aspect
s of communication, the notion of relational communication has evolved from
a unitary focus on dominance to a multi-faceted concept that embraces as m
ag as 12 subcomponents. With the aim of devising a theoretical structure to
these many concepts, we advanced three proposals. First, we distinguished
intensifier variables, such as involvement and substantive variables, such
as dominance and affiliation. Second, we argued that relational judgments a
re hierarchically organized such that dominance and affiliation subsume the
more specific facets of relational communication identified in prior resea
rch. Third, we suggested that dominance and affiliation constitute competin
g frames for interpreting involvement cues during social interaction. A stu
dy was conducted in which participants (N = 805) responded to the Burgoon a
nd Hale (1987) Relational Message Scale. First-order factor analysis was la
rgely successful in reconfirming the structure of the subscales. Second-ord
er factor analysis revealed the anticipated two-factor structure interprete
d as dominance and affiliation. Although involvement was positively correla
ted with both dominance and affiliation, the magnitude of the association v
aried as a function of the salient relational frame.