A comparison of the treatability of southern yellow pine to five Appalachian hardwoods

The preservative treatment variability of many hardwood species is one of t he key stumbling blocks to their wider use in high biodeterioration situati ons, except for railway ties treated with creosote. The home-use or do-it-y ourself market is dominated by southern yellow pine treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA). Recent work performed to determine the treatability of Appalachian hardwoods with CCA, ammoniacal copper quaternary compound, T ype B (ACQ-B), creosote, and berates allowed for some direct comparison of the hardwoods (red oak, beech, hickory, yellow-poplar, and red maple) to so uthern yellow pine. The treatability of southern yellow pine sapwood with C CA was as good or better, when compared to yellow-poplar and red maple sapw ood treated with CCA. Southern yellow pine heartwood was consistently in th e middle range of treatability when compared to the heartwood of the five h ardwoods. Creosote treatment results reaffirmed the well-accepted treatabil ity of hardwoods and explains the dominance in certain industrial markets. Although treatment of hardwoods with CCA, ACQ, and berates was better than southern pine for some hardwoods, the level of penetration and retention, o verall, was not sufficient to meet any existing standards.