P. Neumann, Extravascular lung water and intrathoracic blood volume: double versus single indicator dilution technique, INTEN CAR M, 25(2), 1999, pp. 216-219
Objective: The accuracy of single thermodilution was assessed in measuring
extravascular lung water (EVLW) and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV).
Design: Single thermodilution ((ST)) was prospectively compared with thermo
-dye dilution ((TD)) in 13 mechanically ventilated pigs using the Pulsion C
old Z-021 monitor.
Interventions: Lung injury was induced with oleic acid injection.
Results: EVLWITD increased from 4.3 +/- 1.4 to 11.3 +/- 4.5 ml/kg (p = 0.00
14) and ITBVTD decreased from 581 +/- 66 to 540 +/- 85 mi (p = 0.039) after
induction of lung injury. EVLWST was systematically overestimated (0.5-1 m
l/kg) and ITBVST was slightly underestimated (15-20 ml) when calculated aut
omatically by the Pulsion Cold Z-021 monitor. This bias could be removed by
adjusting two coefficients needed for the computation of ITBVST and EVLWST
so that the following regression equations were obtained: EVLWIST = 0.98 .
EVLWITD + 0.27 (r = 0.94, p < 10(-6)) and ITBVST = 1.0.ITBVTD + 0 (r = 0.8
7, p < 10(-6)).
Conclusions: Single thermodilution allows estimation of ITBV and EVLW value
s with reasonable accuracy and therefore provides useful information about
the cardiac preload and the severity of lung injury. However, automatic cal
culation of EVLWIST and ITBVST using the Pulsion Cold Z-021 might be biased
. Therefore, researchers and clinicians should validate single thermodiluti
on for the given settings, before employing this method to estimate EVLW an
d ITBV.