PURPOSE. The Heidelberg Retinal Flowmeter (HRF), a laser Doppler flowmetry
device, has captured interest as a research and clinical tool for measureme
nt of ocular blood flow. Concerns remain about the range and accuracy of th
e values that it reports.
METHODS. An in vitro blood-flow model was constructed to provide well-contr
olled laminar flow through a glass capillary for assessment by HRF. A chang
e in material behind the glass capillary was used to simulate changing brig
htness conditions between eyes.
RESULTS. Velocities reported by the HRF correlated linearly to true velocit
ies below 8.8 mm/sec. Beyond 8.8 mm/sec, HRF readings fluctuated randomly.
True velocity and HRF reported velocities were highly correlated, with r =
0.967 (P < 0.001) from 0.0 mm/sec to 2.7 mm/sec mean velocity using a light
background, and r = 0.900 (P < 0.001) from 2.7 mm/sec to 8.8 mm/sec using
a darker background. However, a large change in the y-intercept occurred in
the calibration curve with the background change.
CONCLUSIONS. The HRF may report velocities inaccurately because of varying
brightness in the fundus. In the present experiment, a darker background pr
oduced an overreporting of velocities. An offset, possibly introduced by a
noise correction routine, apparently contributed to the inaccuracies of the
HRF measurements. Such offsets vary with local and global brightness. Ther
efore, HRF measurements may be error prone when comparing eyes. When used t
o track perfusion in a single eye over time, meaningful comparison may be p
ossible if meticulous care is taken to align vessels and intensity controls
to achieve a similar level of noise correction between measurements.