This paper examines: (a) the quantity of optimal experiences got during the
on-site phase of outdoor recreation; (b) the quantity of benefits gotten o
ff-site, during the recollection phase of outdoor recreation; and (c) the r
elationship between (a) and (b). Optimal experiences-a psychological state
considered to be special, meaningful, and/or out-of-the-ordinary-are charac
terized by intense focus on a stimulus, an altered sense of time; and loss
of-consciousness of the self. A three item scale, part of an on-site questi
onnaire, was developed to measure the quantity of optimal experiences outdo
or recreationists reported getting. The quantity of benefits recollected of
f-site was measured using a follow-up, mail-out questionnaire (n = 169). Re
gression analyses found significant relationships between the quantity of o
ptimal experiences and the quantity of three benefit categories. With the h
igher meaning and social interaction benefit categories, the relationships
were quadratic; indicating that high quantities of optimal experience produ
ced higher quantities of these benefit categories vs. very low, low, modera
te, and very high quantities of optimal experience. This type of relationsh
ip suggests that very high quantities of optimal experiences may result in
disbenefits-possibly due to the addictive nature of very high quantities of
optimal experiences. With the greater knowledge benefit category, the rela
tionship was cubic; indicating that very low and high quantities of optimal
experiences may produce higher quantities of this benefit category vs. low
, moderate, and very high quantities of optimal experiences. Management imp
lications and research recommendations are discussed.