Serum levels of hepatitis C virus RNA predict non-response to interferon therapy: comparison of two commercial assays

Citation
R. Soffredini et al., Serum levels of hepatitis C virus RNA predict non-response to interferon therapy: comparison of two commercial assays, J VIRAL HEP, 6(1), 1999, pp. 65-71
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
ISSN journal
13520504 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
65 - 71
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-0504(199901)6:1<65:SLOHCV>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
We compared two commercial assays for quantification of serum hepatitis C v irus (HCV) RNA to investigate whether pretreatment levels of serum HCV RNA could predict the outcome of interferon (IFN) therapy. The Amplicor HCV Mon itor test is based on a single, combined reverse transcription and amplific ation reaction carried out by the Tth DNA polymerase using specific primers for the 5' untranslated (UTR) region. The Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 assay is based on specific hybridization of viral RNA by synthetic oligonucleotides complementary to the 5'-UTR and core regions of the genome, allowing equal quantification of the six major genotypes. Receiver-operating characteristi c (ROC) analysis was employed to identify the best cut-off value (predictin g patients who were non-responsive to treatment) with corresponding sensiti vity and specificity values, Logistic regression analysis was performed usi ng these cut-off values, We studied 133 consecutive patients with chronic h epatitis C enrolled in a prospective trial of IFN-alpha therapy (18 of whom were sustained complete responders), The median viraemia of the 18 sustain ed responders was 5322 copies ml(-1) by the Monitor test and less than 0.2 million equivalents ml(-1) (MEq ml(-1)) by the Quantiplex assay; for the 11 5 non-responders/relapsers, the median viraemia was 83 125 copies ml(-1) an d 1.128 MEq ml(-1) for the Monitor test and Quantiplex assay, respectively. Spearman's rank; test gave a correlation of 0.63 between assays. The best predicting cut-off values were 22134 copies ml(-1) for the Monitor test and 0.330 MEq ml(-1) for the Quantiplex assay; their respective sensitivities and specificities were 72% and 75% for Monitor and 67% and 83% for Quantipl ex. By logistic regression analysis, the age and gender-adjusted odds ratio s of high vs low HCV RNA levels, defining the risk, of non-response, were 1 0.6 (CI 3.1-35.7) for Monitor and 14.3 (CI 4.3-47.3) for Quantiplex. The tw o assays had comparable sensitivity for serum HCV RNA but they identified d ifferent predictive cut-offs for non-response to therapy.