Iron deficiency is the most frequently encountered cause of suboptimal resp
onse to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). Carefully assessing iron
status is of paramount importance in chronic renal failure patients prior
to or during rHuEPO therapy. Because there is great need for iron in the EP
O-stimulated erythroid progenitors, it is essential that serum ferritin and
transferrin saturation levels should be maintained over 300 mu g/liter and
30%, respectively. Investigators have shown that oral iron is unlikely to
keep pace with the iron demand for an optimal rHuEPO response in uremics. T
herefore, patients with iron deficiency will always require intravenous iro
n therapy. The early and prompt iron supplementation can lead to reductions
in rHuEPO dose and hence cost. After the iron deficiency has been correcte
d or excluded, we must remember all of the possible causes of hyporesponsiv
eness in every rHuEPO-treated patient. As dose requirements vary, it is not
clear which dose of rHuEPO causes this hyporesponsiveness. However, if the
patient with iron repletion does not respond well after the induction peri
od, the major causes blunting the response to rHuEPO should be investigated
. Most factors are reversible and remediable, except resistant anemia assoc
iated with hemoglobinopathy or bone marrow fibrosis, which requires a furth
er increase in the rHuEPO dose. By means of early detection and correction
of the possible causes, the goal of increasing therapeutic efficacy can be
achieved. Iron overload may lead to an enhanced risk for infection, cardiov
ascular complication, and cancer. Over-treatment with iron should be avoide
d in dialysis patients, despite the fact that the safe upper limit of serum
ferritin to avoid iron overload is not clearly defined. On the other hand,
functional iron deficiency may develop even when serum ferritin levels are
increased. Controversy remains as to whether intravenous iron therapy can
overcome this form of hyporesponsiveness in iron-overloaded patients. Moreo
ver, a treatment option of iron supplementation is not warranted in these p
atients, as the potential hazards of iron overload will be worsened. We dem
onstrated that the mean hematocrit significantly increased from 25.1 +/- 0.
9% to 31 +/- 1.2% after eight weeks of intravenous ascorbate therapy (300 m
g three times a week) in 12 hemodialysis patients with serum ferritin level
s of more than 500 mu g/liter. The enhanced erythropoiesis paralleled with
a rise in transferrin saturation (27.8 +/- 2.5% vs. 44.8 +/- 9.5%, P < 0.05
) and reductions in erythrocyte zinc protoporphyrin (130 +/- 32 vs. 72 +/-
19 mu mol/mol heme, P < 0.05) and monthly rHuEPO dose (24.2 +/- 4.5 vs. 16.
8 +/- 3.4 x 10(3) units, P < 0.05) at the end of study. It is speculated th
at ascorbate supplementation not only facilitates the iron release from sto
rage sites and its delivery to hematopoietic tissues, but also increases ir
on utilization in erythroid cells. Our study provides a more complete under
standing of the pathogenesis of iron overload-related anemia and the develo
pment of an adjuvant therapy, intravenous ascorbic acid, to the existing tr
eatments.